Clinical Data

To date, three institutions have reported on their experience with transrectal HIFU as a minimally invasive therapy for localized prostate cancer.6-8,24-29 Gelet et al. initiated a phase II

clinical trial in 1992 and reported in 1999 on 50 patients with localized prostate cancer unsuitable for radical prostatectomy who underwent a total of 113 HIFU treatment sessions.7 Median follow-up was 24 months (range 3-46 months). Negative post-HIFU biopsies and a prostate specific antigen (PSA) nadir of less than 4.0 ng/ml were seen in 28 patients (56%), 6% had negative biopsies but a serum PSA exceeding 4.0 ng/ml, yet 38% had residual cancer on the follow-up biopsies.7 The complication rate was as high as 50% with the first prototype; this number declined to 17% (urinary retention, urinary tract infection, bladder neck sclerosis, urinary incontinence) in those treated with a modified HIFU system.

The Munich group treated 184 patients with a total of 232 HIFU sessions; 80% were treated as a primary therapy for localized prostate cancer, 10% for local recurrences and 10% for local debulking.27-29 Mean operating time was 90 minutes. Follow-up biopsies were negative in 80%, and a PSA nadir of less than 4.0 ng/ml was observed in 97%, including 61% with a PSA nadir of <0.5 ng/ml (Table 56.1). All patients received a

Table 56.1. Outcome following HIFU treatment of localized prostate cancer (n = 184). Modified from Thuroff et al.29

PSA nadir following HIFU (ng/ml)

Was this article helpful?

0 0
Naturally Cure Erectile Dysfunction

Naturally Cure Erectile Dysfunction

Whether we like it or not, for many men it gets increasingly difficult to perform sexually as the years advance.

Get My Free Ebook

Post a comment